IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L
IDPE.L (iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IDPE.L tracks the S&P LISTED PRIVATE EQUITY INDEX (NET) (USD) while XLFQ.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDPE.L returned 10.81%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for XLFQ.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDPE.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFQ.L.
Performance
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDPE.L is traded in USD, while XLFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLFQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDPE.L achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly lower than XLFQ.L's 3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IDPE.L has underperformed XLFQ.L with an annualized return of 10.81%, while XLFQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.
IDPE.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- -13.72%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 1Y
- -16.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
XLFQ.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDPE.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -11.15% | 1.30% | 23.80% | 39.29% | -28.48% | 41.86% | 4.59% | 43.87% | -13.92% | 25.05% |
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 3.42% | 15.15% | 29.95% | 11.72% | -11.04% | 36.65% | -3.70% | 32.26% | -14.64% | 22.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDPE.L and XLFQ.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IDPE.L and XLFQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDPE.L
XLFQ.L
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDPE.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDPE.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.12 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 0.67 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 1.66 | -2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDPE.L drawdown since its inception was -82.58%, which is greater than XLFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDPE.L and XLFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDPE.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -42.38% | -40.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -14.29% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | -18.97% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.86% | -26.74% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.36% | -42.38% | -7.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.65% | -0.57% | -17.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.32% | -12.41% | -7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.88% | 5.80% | +8.08% |
Volatility
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDPE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that IDPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDPE.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 3.60% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 10.53% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 14.08% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 23.20% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 22.98% | -0.87% |
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDPE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDPE.L vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
IDPE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDPE.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.82% | 2.96% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.36% | 2.54% | 3.56% | 3.25% | 5.05% | 4.96% | 4.33% | 5.53% |
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDPE.L and XLFQ.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLFQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDPE.L.
IDPE.L tracks S&P LISTED PRIVATE EQUITY INDEX (NET) (USD), while XLFQ.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDPE.L and 0.14% for XLFQ.L.
Find the right allocation for IDPE.L and XLFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer