IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L
IDPE.L (iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IDPE.L tracks the iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDPE.L returned 10.74%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for ISAC.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDPE.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDPE.L achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IDPE.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 10.74%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
IDPE.L
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDPE.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF | -11.49% | 1.30% | 23.80% | 39.29% | -28.48% | 41.86% | 4.59% | 43.87% | -13.92% | 25.05% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.18% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | -18.16% | 18.85% | 15.66% | 25.75% | -9.73% | 24.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDPE.L and ISAC.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IDPE.L and ISAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDPE.L
ISAC.L
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IDPE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.34 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 2.70 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 10.76 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDPE.L drawdown since its inception was -82.58%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDPE.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -33.82% | -48.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -8.77% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | -16.56% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.86% | -26.07% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.36% | -33.82% | -16.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.97% | -1.03% | -16.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.32% | -4.62% | -15.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.84% | 2.20% | +11.64% |
Volatility
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IDPE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that IDPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 3.18% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.89% | 10.57% | +6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 12.88% | +7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 15.65% | +6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 15.82% | +6.29% |
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDPE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
IDPE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDPE.L iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF | 3.83% | 2.96% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.36% | 2.54% | 3.56% | 3.25% | 5.05% | 4.96% | 4.33% | 5.53% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDPE.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDPE.L.
IDPE.L tracks iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDPE.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for IDPE.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer