PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IDPE.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDPE.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDPE.L achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.


IDPE.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-0.03%
6M
-12.08%
YTD
-11.49%
1Y
-14.17%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
10.74%

WRDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
8.92%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IDPE.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF
-11.49%1.30%22.99%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.11%21.28%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IDPE.L and WRDA.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.72

The correlation between IDPE.L and WRDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDPE.L
IDPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IDPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IDPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IDPE.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDPE.LWRDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

0.80

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

1.20

-2.29

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDPE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDPE.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDPE.L drawdown since its inception was -82.58%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDPE.L and WRDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDPE.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.58%

-27.71%

-54.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.69%

-27.71%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.97%

-15.53%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.32%

-7.46%

-12.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.84%

18.35%

-4.51%

Volatility

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IDPE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that IDPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDPE.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

2.96%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.89%

9.04%

+7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

43.30%

-22.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

29.74%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

29.74%

-7.63%

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDPE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IDPE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDPE.L
iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF
3.83%2.96%3.03%3.35%4.36%2.54%3.56%3.25%5.05%4.96%4.33%5.53%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDPE.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDPE.L.

IDPE.L tracks iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDPE.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDPE.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer