PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDOG vs. EQL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDOG vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDOG achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has underperformed EQL with an annualized return of 11.04%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


IDOG

1D
0.32%
1M
2.78%
YTD
14.56%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.92%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
11.04%

EQL

1D
0.20%
1M
0.66%
YTD
9.00%
6M
9.87%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDOG vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.56%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
9.00%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IDOG and EQL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.73

The correlation between IDOG and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDOG vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDOG
EQL

Industrials

11.7%
8.7%

Financial Services

11.0%
8.9%

Energy

10.7%
8.6%

Utilities

10.0%
8.9%

Basic Materials

10.0%
8.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
8.7%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.6%

Technology

8.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

-

9.3%

Industrials

IDOG
11.7%
EQL
8.7%

Financial Services

IDOG
11.0%
EQL
8.9%

Energy

IDOG
10.7%
EQL
8.6%

Utilities

IDOG
10.0%
EQL
8.9%

Basic Materials

IDOG
10.0%
EQL
8.2%

Communication Services

IDOG
9.9%
EQL
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IDOG
9.5%
EQL
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

IDOG
9.4%
EQL
8.7%

Healthcare

IDOG
9.3%
EQL
8.6%

Technology

IDOG
8.5%
EQL
10.8%

Real Estate

IDOG

-

EQL
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDOG vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDOG vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDOGEQLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.10

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.96

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

3.22

+2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.56

12.63

+6.93

IDOG vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDOG and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDOGEQLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.10

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.74

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.76

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.85

-0.34

Drawdowns

IDOG vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and EQL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDOGEQLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-35.65%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.19%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-15.07%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-19.24%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-35.65%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-3.26%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.58%

+0.27%

Volatility

IDOG vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.26%. This indicates that IDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDOGEQLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

2.26%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

6.85%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

9.34%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

14.55%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.54%

+0.91%

IDOG vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDOG vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than EQL's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.62%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.40%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDOG and EQL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDOG has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to EQL (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs EQL's -35.65%.

On 10-year performance, EQL leads with 12.49% vs 11.04% for IDOG. On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EQL has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.62% for EQL.

IDOG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EQL is Large Cap Blend Equities. IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.27% for EQL.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDOG and EQL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer