IDOG vs. EQL
IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDOG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDOG returned 11.04%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for EQL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDOG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.
Performance
IDOG vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDOG achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has underperformed EQL with an annualized return of 11.04%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
EQL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 19.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
IDOG vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.56% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | -1.78% | 21.93% | -13.47% | 25.61% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 9.00% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDOG and EQL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IDOG and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDOG vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDOG
EQL
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IDOG
EQL
Financial Services
IDOG
EQL
Energy
IDOG
EQL
Utilities
IDOG
EQL
Basic Materials
IDOG
EQL
Communication Services
IDOG
EQL
Consumer Cyclical
IDOG
EQL
Consumer Defensive
IDOG
EQL
Healthcare
IDOG
EQL
Technology
IDOG
EQL
Real Estate
IDOG
-
EQL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDOG vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
IDOG
EQL
IDOG vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDOG | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 2.10 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 2.96 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.58 | 3.22 | +2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.56 | 12.63 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDOG | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.10 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.74 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.76 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.85 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IDOG vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and EQL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDOG | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -35.65% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.19% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.92% | -15.07% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.31% | -19.24% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -35.65% | -1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.85% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -3.26% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.58% | +0.27% |
Volatility
IDOG vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.26%. This indicates that IDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDOG | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 2.26% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 6.85% | +3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 9.34% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 14.55% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 16.54% | +0.91% |
IDOG vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDOG vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than EQL's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.40% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDOG and EQL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDOG has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to EQL (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs EQL's -35.65%.
On 10-year performance, EQL leads with 12.49% vs 11.04% for IDOG. On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQL has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.62% for EQL.
IDOG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EQL is Large Cap Blend Equities. IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.27% for EQL.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDOG and EQL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer