PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.


IDMO

1D
0.67%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
5.33%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
12.02%

QTUM

1D
3.25%
1M
8.85%
YTD
44.14%
6M
39.20%
1Y
80.80%
3Y*
48.48%
5Y*
27.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
5.33%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-13.81%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
44.14%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and QTUM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.69

The correlation between IDMO and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDMO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
QTUM

Financial Services

42.4%

-

Industrials

22.6%
8.7%

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Utilities

8.4%

-

Technology

5.3%
85.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Communication Services

2.2%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
0.7%

Healthcare

1.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
QTUM

-

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
QTUM
8.7%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
QTUM

-

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
QTUM

-

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
QTUM
85.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
QTUM

-

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
QTUM
4.9%

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
QTUM

-

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
QTUM

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
QTUM
0.7%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
QTUM
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMOQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

5.32

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

19.76

-13.27

IDMO vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMOQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.94

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.04

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.03

-0.59

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, roughly equal to the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-38.45%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-15.26%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-25.39%

+12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-38.45%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-6.53%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-8.25%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

4.10%

-1.11%

Volatility

IDMO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is 6.18%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that IDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

13.41%

-7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

22.31%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

27.73%

-10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

26.85%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

27.34%

-9.20%

IDMO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.74%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to IDMO (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 15.15% for IDMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 15.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while QTUM is Technology Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer