PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -2.40% return.


IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%

GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-10.20%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-14.10%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and GLDM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.23

The correlation between IDMO and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
GLDM

Financial Services

42.4%

-

Industrials

22.6%

-

Basic Materials

10.2%
100.0%

Utilities

8.4%

-

Technology

5.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
GLDM

-

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
GLDM
100.0%

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
GLDM

-

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
GLDM

-

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
GLDM

-

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.00

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

2.87

+4.77

IDMO vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-24.35%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-24.35%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-24.35%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-24.35%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-21.96%

+20.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-6.27%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

8.44%

-5.40%

Volatility

IDMO vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

7.73%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

23.93%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

27.15%

-9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.13%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.98%

+1.20%

IDMO vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDMO vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and GLDM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.41% vs 15.50% for IDMO. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while GLDM is Gold. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.10% for GLDM.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer