PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. EMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 15.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed EMLP with an annualized return of 12.64%, while EMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%

EMLP

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
15.76%
6M
15.73%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
15.76%9.67%33.39%8.05%10.39%23.20%-13.36%23.40%-8.70%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and EMLP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2012

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IDMO and EMLP has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IDMO vs. EMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
EMLP

Financial Services

42.4%

-

Industrials

22.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

10.2%
0.6%

Utilities

8.4%
47.4%

Technology

5.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Energy

1.9%
48.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
EMLP

-

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
EMLP
3.9%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
EMLP
0.6%

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
EMLP
47.4%

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
EMLP

-

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
EMLP

-

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
EMLP

-

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
EMLP

-

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
EMLP
48.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
EMLP

-

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
EMLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EMLP
EMLP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOEMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

4.03

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

12.36

-4.72

IDMO vs. EMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the EMLP Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and EMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and EMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOEMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-43.61%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-4.94%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-11.47%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-14.59%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-43.61%

+12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-2.66%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-5.75%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

1.61%

+1.43%

Volatility

IDMO vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) at 3.79%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOEMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

3.79%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

7.86%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

9.87%

+8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

14.53%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.69%

+0.49%

IDMO vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than EMLP's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
2.76%3.18%3.19%3.92%3.15%3.29%4.70%3.71%4.71%3.80%3.62%4.63%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and EMLP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EMLP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs EMLP's -43.61%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 10.37% for EMLP. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.76% for EMLP.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.96% for EMLP.

EMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and EMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer