IDMO vs. EDEN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDMO returned 12.64%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for EDEN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDMO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDEN.

Performance

IDMO vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 12.64%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.22% annualized return.

IDMO

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 23.12%
• 3Y*: 25.21%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

EDEN

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -3.05%
• 6M: -2.55%
• 1Y: -6.97%
• 3Y*: 2.87%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	8.17%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	29.21%
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	-3.05%	10.58%	-3.94%	17.99%	-11.47%	14.81%	42.56%	24.37%	-14.43%	35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and EDEN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.54

The correlation between IDMO and EDEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDMO	EDEN
Financial Services	42.4%	16.2%
Industrials	22.6%	31.3%
Basic Materials	10.2%	4.8%
Utilities	8.4%	3.9%
Technology	5.3%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	2.2%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Energy	1.9%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	2.0%
Healthcare	1.2%	34.8%

Return for Risk

IDMO vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 44
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

EDEN

EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 6
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDMO	EDEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	-0.34	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	-0.33	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.96	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	-0.33	+2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	-0.72	+8.36

IDMO vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and EDEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDMO	EDEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.38%	-36.61%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-21.17%	+8.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.65%	-29.31%	+16.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.07%	-36.61%	+9.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.34%	-36.61%	+5.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-13.55%	+11.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-7.37%	-2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	10.27%	-7.23%

Volatility

IDMO vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) at 4.93%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDMO	EDEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	4.93%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	15.72%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.92%	20.90%	-2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.03%	20.25%	-2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	19.41%	-1.23%

IDMO vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDMO vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than EDEN's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	2.87%	2.79%	1.50%	1.92%	1.47%	0.74%	0.42%	2.36%	2.01%	2.03%	1.28%	1.46%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	3.52%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDMO and EDEN in my portfolio?

IDMO and EDEN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDMO or EDEN?

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EDEN (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

Which ETF is better, IDMO or EDEN?

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 9.22% for EDEN. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDMO or EDEN?

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDMO or EDEN?

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDMO or EDEN?

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.87% for EDEN.

What is the main difference between IDMO and EDEN?

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while EDEN is Europe Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.53% for EDEN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.