IDME vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDME returned 18.02%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for WBIF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

IDME vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than WBIF's 11.61% return.

IDME

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 16.05%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 33.98%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	16.05%	27.53%	6.12%	9.07%	-19.79%	-1.25%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	-1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and WBIF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.58

The correlation between IDME and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDME vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDME	WBIF
Financial Services	19.2%	31.0%
Industrials	13.8%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	11.1%
Technology	9.9%	19.9%
Healthcare	9.6%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	3.1%
Basic Materials	8.1%	1.0%
Energy	5.6%	2.9%
Communication Services	5.4%	2.6%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Utilities	3.0%	10.3%

Return for Risk

IDME vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME

IDME Risk / Return Rank: 65
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 66

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDME	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.88	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.73	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.50	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	12.53	-0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDME vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDME	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	1.88	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.30	+0.14

Drawdowns

IDME vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDME	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-20.29%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-6.60%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-17.16%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-0.97%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.17%	-7.74%	-3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	1.84%	+1.03%

Volatility

IDME vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.13%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDME	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.13%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.95%	8.63%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.48%	12.31%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	12.86%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	12.34%	+2.30%

IDME vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDME vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	4.98%	4.90%	5.64%	3.71%	2.62%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDME and WBIF in my portfolio?

IDME and WBIF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDME or WBIF?

IDME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, IDME or WBIF?

On 3-year performance, IDME leads with 18.02% vs 8.85% for WBIF. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDME or WBIF?

Over the 3-year period, IDME has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDME or WBIF?

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDME or WBIF?

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between IDME and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.