PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. PID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDME vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.


IDME

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.97%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.64%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10Y*

PID

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.45%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
16.05%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
5.45%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and PID is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.76

The correlation between IDME and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDME vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDME
PID

Financial Services

19.2%
17.5%

Industrials

13.8%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
6.4%

Technology

9.9%
8.7%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
6.0%

Basic Materials

8.1%
3.4%

Energy

5.6%
13.3%

Communication Services

5.4%
13.8%

Real Estate

3.2%
0.4%

Utilities

3.0%
14.2%

Financial Services

IDME
19.2%
PID
17.5%

Industrials

IDME
13.8%
PID
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IDME
11.1%
PID
6.4%

Technology

IDME
9.9%
PID
8.7%

Healthcare

IDME
9.6%
PID
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

IDME
8.4%
PID
6.0%

Basic Materials

IDME
8.1%
PID
3.4%

Energy

IDME
5.6%
PID
13.3%

Communication Services

IDME
5.4%
PID
13.8%

Real Estate

IDME
3.2%
PID
0.4%

Utilities

IDME
3.0%
PID
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMEPIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.16

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

7.36

+4.51

IDME vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMEPIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.66

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.27

+0.17

Drawdowns

IDME vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and PID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEPIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-66.34%

+37.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-7.47%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-13.34%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-2.19%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-13.04%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.18%

+0.69%

Volatility

IDME vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMEPIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

2.75%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

7.62%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

9.70%

+5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

13.97%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

17.84%

-3.20%

IDME vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDME vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than PID's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.98%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.27%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDME and PID have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs PID's -66.34%.

On 3-year performance, IDME leads with 18.02% vs 12.52% for PID. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDME has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 3.27% for PID.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.56% for PID.

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDME and PID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer