IDME vs. JULB
IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDME is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while JULB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
IDME vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
IDME
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDME vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 16.05% | 4.53% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDME and JULB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDME vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
IDME
JULB
IDME vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDME | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDME | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 2.17 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
IDME vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDME | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -5.24% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.07% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -0.87% | -10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility
IDME vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDME | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 6.81% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 6.81% | +7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 6.81% | +7.83% |
IDME vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDME vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 4.98% | 4.90% | 5.64% | 3.71% | 2.62% | 1.38% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDME and JULB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.
IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.
IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while JULB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for IDME and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer