IDME vs. INKM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDME returned 18.02%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for INKM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.

Performance

IDME vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 5.61% return.

IDME

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 16.05%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 33.98%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INKM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	16.05%	27.53%	6.12%	9.07%	-19.79%	-1.25%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.61%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-12.58%	1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and INKM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.71

The correlation between IDME and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDME vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDME	INKM
Financial Services	19.2%	8.3%
Industrials	13.8%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	5.1%
Technology	9.9%	13.2%
Healthcare	9.6%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	8.6%
Basic Materials	8.1%	1.4%
Energy	5.6%	11.1%
Communication Services	5.4%	6.2%
Real Estate	3.2%	10.9%
Utilities	3.0%	13.9%

Return for Risk

IDME vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME

IDME Risk / Return Rank: 65
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 66

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 65
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDME	INKM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.20	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	3.12	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.87	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	11.30	+0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDME vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDME	INKM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.20	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.57	-0.13

Drawdowns

IDME vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, roughly equal to the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and INKM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDME	INKM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-28.58%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-4.55%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-9.25%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-0.33%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.17%	-3.69%	-7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	1.15%	+1.72%

Volatility

IDME vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDME	INKM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	1.67%	+3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.95%	4.59%	+8.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.48%	5.95%	+9.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	8.30%	+6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	9.78%	+4.86%

IDME vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDME vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than INKM's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	4.98%	4.90%	5.64%	3.71%	2.62%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.86%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDME and INKM in my portfolio?

IDME and INKM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDME or INKM?

IDME has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs INKM's -28.58%.

Which ETF is better, IDME or INKM?

On 3-year performance, IDME leads with 18.02% vs 10.04% for INKM. On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDME or INKM?

Over the 3-year period, IDME has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDME or INKM?

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDME or INKM?

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.86% for INKM.

What is the main difference between IDME and INKM?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.50% for INKM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.