PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. DUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDME vs. DUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than DUBS's 13.77% return.


IDME

1D
0.49%
1M
0.49%
6M
8.88%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.22%

DUBS

1D
1.35%
1M
2.18%
6M
12.14%
YTD
13.77%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$881.48K$1.25M$931.41K
$938.24K$1.05M$895.28K

IDME vs. DUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
15.77%27.53%6.12%2.90%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
13.77%19.28%24.08%7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and DUBS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023

0.70

The correlation between IDME and DUBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDME vs. DUBS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDME
DUBS

Financial Services

19.2%
11.5%

Industrials

13.8%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.6%

Technology

9.9%
38.4%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

8.1%
1.7%

Energy

5.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

5.4%
9.9%

Real Estate

3.2%
1.8%

Utilities

3.0%
2.2%

Financial Services

IDME
19.2%
DUBS
11.5%

Industrials

IDME
13.8%
DUBS
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IDME
11.1%
DUBS
9.6%

Technology

IDME
9.9%
DUBS
38.4%

Healthcare

IDME
9.6%
DUBS
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

IDME
8.4%
DUBS
4.5%

Basic Materials

IDME
8.1%
DUBS
1.7%

Energy

IDME
5.6%
DUBS
3.0%

Communication Services

IDME
5.4%
DUBS
9.9%

Real Estate

IDME
3.2%
DUBS
1.8%

Utilities

IDME
3.0%
DUBS
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. DUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDME vs. DUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMEDUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.36

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.35

14.49

-4.13

IDME vs. DUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the DUBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and DUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDME vs. DUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than DUBS's maximum drawdown of -18.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEDUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-18.48%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-8.29%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-18.48%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

0.00%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-1.93%

-8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.92%

+1.06%

Volatility

IDME vs. DUBS - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) at 3.96%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMEDUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.96%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

10.83%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

13.81%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.64%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

14.64%

+0.17%

IDME vs. DUBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DUBS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDME vs. DUBS - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than DUBS's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.97%2.06%2.52%1.14%0.00%0.00%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.57%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDME and DUBS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDME has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to DUBS (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs DUBS's -18.48%.

On 3-year performance, DUBS leads with 21.04% vs 16.93% for IDME. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 16.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.97% for DUBS.

IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while DUBS is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.39% for DUBS.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDME and DUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer