IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS
IDJG.AS (iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF) and CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDJG.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CNDX.AS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDJG.AS returned 10.03%/yr vs 21.25%/yr for CNDX.AS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDJG.AS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNDX.AS.
Performance
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDJG.AS achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IDJG.AS has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 10.03%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.25% annualized return.
IDJG.AS
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDJG.AS iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF | 11.17% | 10.86% | 10.46% | 20.59% | -17.31% | 26.89% | 6.04% | 34.28% | -10.77% | 12.45% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.95% | 6.16% | 35.29% | 50.41% | -29.90% | 38.80% | 35.83% | 40.51% | 4.53% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDJG.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IDJG.AS and CNDX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IDJG.AS
CNDX.AS
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDJG.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.70 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 11.01 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDJG.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 2.41 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.93 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 1.07 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.03 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDJG.AS drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDJG.AS and CNDX.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDJG.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.97% | -31.21% | -25.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -10.06% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.09% | -26.57% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.00% | -31.21% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | -31.21% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.77% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -5.45% | -5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.41% | +0.47% |
Volatility
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) at 4.35%. This indicates that IDJG.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDJG.AS | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 4.35% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 10.74% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 15.45% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 19.72% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 19.61% | -0.82% |
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDJG.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDJG.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
IDJG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDJG.AS iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF | 1.08% | 1.04% | 0.97% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.55% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.57% | 1.80% | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDJG.AS and CNDX.AS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.AS is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.AS is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDJG.AS.
IDJG.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNDX.AS is Nasdaq-100. IDJG.AS tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDJG.AS and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Find the right allocation for IDJG.AS and CNDX.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer