IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

IDIN.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - IDIN.L tracks the iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IDIN.L returned 17.61% vs 22.07% for WRDA.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDIN.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.

Performance

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IDIN.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDIN.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDIN.L achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.

IDIN.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 11.85%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 1Y: 17.61%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: 7.03%

WRDA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 8.92%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IDIN.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF	11.94%	12.97%	10.64%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.11%	21.28%	17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IDIN.L and WRDA.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.30

The correlation between IDIN.L and WRDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDIN.L

IDIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
IDIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IDIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IDIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IDIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IDIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

WRDA.L

WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IDIN.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDIN.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	0.51	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	1.14	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	0.80	+2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.81	1.20	+7.61

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDIN.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDIN.L drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDIN.L and WRDA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDIN.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.57%	-27.71%	-21.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.08%	-27.71%	+22.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-15.53%	+14.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.72%	-7.46%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	18.35%	-16.40%

Volatility

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IDIN.L) is 2.70%, while UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that IDIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDIN.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	2.96%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.85%	9.04%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.60%	43.30%	-32.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	29.74%	-16.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.39%	29.74%	-15.35%

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDIN.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDIN.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IDIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDIN.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF	2.04%	2.20%	2.36%	2.37%	2.11%	1.93%	2.08%	2.05%	2.34%	2.60%	2.80%	3.20%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDIN.L and WRDA.L in my portfolio?

IDIN.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDIN.L or WRDA.L?

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDIN.L or WRDA.L?

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDIN.L.

What is the main difference between IDIN.L and WRDA.L?

IDIN.L tracks iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDIN.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.