IDGT vs. TRUT
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IDGT is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
IDGT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 53.90% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
IDGT
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 53.90%
- 6M
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 53.90% | 4.44% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and TRUT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
TRUT
IDGT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.13 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.54 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 2.39 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -18.55% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.46% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -5.17% | -14.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility
IDGT vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.41% | 21.53% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 21.53% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 21.53% | +1.76% |
IDGT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and TRUT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.
IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer