PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDGT vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDGT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 35.87% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 9.47% return.


IDGT

1D
1.84%
1M
0.79%
6M
32.35%
YTD
35.87%
1Y
40.38%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
12.50%
ALL TIME*
4.93%

CRTC

1D
2.36%
1M
3.10%
6M
7.08%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$249.56K$623.71K$501.58K
$4.41M$4.29M$8.06M

IDGT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
35.87%6.79%26.71%8.52%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
9.47%18.69%18.05%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IDGT and CRTC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023

0.71

The correlation between IDGT and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDGT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDGT
CRTC

Technology

58.1%
39.6%

Real Estate

41.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

6.7%
14.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

5.8%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

13.5%

Industrials

-

13.4%

Utilities

-

5.5%

Technology

IDGT
58.1%
CRTC
39.6%

Real Estate

IDGT
41.9%
CRTC
0.1%

Communication Services

IDGT
6.7%
CRTC
14.0%

Basic Materials

IDGT

-

CRTC
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IDGT

-

CRTC
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

IDGT

-

CRTC
0.0%

Energy

IDGT

-

CRTC
5.8%

Financial Services

IDGT

-

CRTC
0.1%

Healthcare

IDGT

-

CRTC
13.5%

Industrials

IDGT

-

CRTC
13.4%

Utilities

IDGT

-

CRTC
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDGT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDGT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDGTCRTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.91

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

6.01

+1.82

IDGT vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDGT and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDGT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDGTCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.95%

-19.07%

-58.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-9.05%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.10%

-0.47%

-12.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.85%

-2.23%

-17.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

2.88%

+2.29%

Volatility

IDGT vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 4.30%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDGTCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

4.30%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

11.00%

+7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

14.04%

+8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

15.82%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

15.82%

+7.53%

IDGT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDGT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDGT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than CRTC's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
0.87%1.03%1.13%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.79%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDGT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to CRTC (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

On 1-year performance, IDGT leads with 40.38% vs 17.24% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 40.38% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IDGT.

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.79% for IDGT.

IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IDGT and 0.35% for CRTC.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDGT and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer