IDGT vs. ACWI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).

IDGT and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDGT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 10, 2001. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both IDGT and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IDGT vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IDGT vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	15.26%	6.79%	26.71%	-6.09%	-17.90%	42.14%	8.78%	17.39%	-1.97%	11.81%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	-2.21%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's -2.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDGT having a 11.15% annualized return and ACWI not far ahead at 11.58%.

IDGT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 33.94%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

ACWI

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -6.11%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDGT vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

IDGT

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF

ACWI

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Return for Risk

IDGT vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 75
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDGT vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDGT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	1.77	+0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	1.79	+1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	8.26	+2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDGT vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDGT and ACWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDGT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.59	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.68	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.39	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between IDGT and ACWI is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IDGT vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ACWI's 1.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.97%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.59%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%

Drawdowns

IDGT vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDGT	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.95%	-56.00%	-21.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-11.76%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.83%	-26.42%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.88%	-33.53%	-3.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.55%	-6.92%	+4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-8.69%	-11.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	2.54%	+0.66%

Volatility

IDGT vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 6.38%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDGT	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.20%	6.38%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	10.05%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.55%	17.48%	+4.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.03%	15.97%	+7.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.14%	17.08%	+6.06%