IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L
IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDFF.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDFF.L returned 9.66%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDFF.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDFF.L achieves a 26.95% return, which is significantly higher than ISAC.L's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IDFF.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 9.66%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
IDFF.L
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 48.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 26.95% | 39.49% | 12.16% | 1.47% | -21.79% | -9.20% | 25.91% | 17.27% | -15.18% | 41.70% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.18% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | -18.16% | 18.85% | 15.66% | 25.75% | -9.73% | 24.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDFF.L and ISAC.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IDFF.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDFF.L
ISAC.L
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDFF.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.70 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 10.76 | +0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDFF.L drawdown since its inception was -64.08%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDFF.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDFF.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -33.82% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -8.77% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -16.56% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.71% | -26.07% | -17.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.09% | -33.82% | -16.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -1.03% | -9.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -4.62% | -13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.20% | +2.12% |
Volatility
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that IDFF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDFF.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 3.18% | +7.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 10.57% | +11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.77% | 12.88% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 15.65% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 15.82% | +4.99% |
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDFF.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDFF.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.10% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDFF.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
IDFF.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IDFF.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for IDFF.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer