IDEF vs. IBIT
IDEF (iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. IDEF is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, IDEF returned 21.86% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IDEF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEF achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
IDEF
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDEF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 4.74% | 23.05% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -19.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEF and IBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IDEF
IBIT
IDEF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | -0.89 | +1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | -1.23 | +2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.86 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | -0.79 | +2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | -1.36 | +5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | -0.89 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.30 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
IDEF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEF drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEF and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -49.36% | +34.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -49.36% | +34.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -48.10% | +35.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -16.02% | +12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 28.44% | -22.83% |
Volatility
IDEF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) is 7.87%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 9.50% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.98% | 34.44% | -16.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 43.73% | -22.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 50.19% | -29.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 50.19% | -29.12% |
IDEF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 0.16% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEF and IBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IDEF (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEF dropped -14.63% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, IDEF leads with 21.86% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDEF has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDEF has performed better with a 21.86% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDEF.
IDEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IDEF and 0.25% for IBIT.
IDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEF and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer