IDEC vs. APRQ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IDEC (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. IDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.

Performance

IDEC vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IDEC

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 13.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEC vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December	0.25%
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%

IDEC vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDEC	APRQ
Financial Services	24.7%	13.7%
Industrials	19.8%	7.4%
Healthcare	10.6%	10.5%
Technology	10.3%	32.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	5.5%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.7%
Communication Services	4.5%	9.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.2%
Utilities	4.0%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.1%

Return for Risk

IDEC vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEC

IDEC Risk / Return Rank: 49
IDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEC vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDEC	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDEC	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	—	—

Drawdowns

IDEC vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and APRQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEC	APRQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	0.00%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	0.00%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	0.00%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IDEC	APRQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.74%	0.00%	+8.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.68%	0.00%	+9.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.68%	0.00%	+9.68%

IDEC vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDEC vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither IDEC nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IDEC or APRQ?

On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDEC or APRQ?

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDEC or APRQ?

IDEC and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IDEC and APRQ?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.79% for APRQ.