IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L
IDAP.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) and JRCD.L (JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDAP.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while JRCD.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDAP.L returned 20.17%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for JRCD.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDAP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JRCD.L.
Performance
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDAP.L is traded in USD, while JRCD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRCD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDAP.L achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly lower than JRCD.L's 10,918.34% return.
IDAP.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
JRCD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9,793.27%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 10,918.34%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 14.67% | 29.67% | 6.20% | 13.46% | -8.71% |
JRCD.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 10,918.34% | -98.71% | 9.57% | -13.40% | -19.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDAP.L and JRCD.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDAP.L
JRCD.L
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDAP.L | JRCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -277.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 90.12 | -88.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 0.35 | +3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 0.69 | +10.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -69.97%, smaller than the maximum JRCD.L drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDAP.L and JRCD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDAP.L | JRCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.97% | -99.18% | +29.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -99.07% | +90.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -99.13% | +80.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -3.69% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -24.55% | +11.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 49.56% | -46.75% |
Volatility
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) is 3.62%, while JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRCD.L) has a volatility of 457.76%. This indicates that IDAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRCD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDAP.L | JRCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 457.76% | -454.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 1,384.21% | -1,373.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 27,655.22% | -27,642.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 13,297.45% | -13,282.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 13,297.45% | -13,280.90% |
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDAP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JRCD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDAP.L vs. JRCD.L - Dividend Comparison
IDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than JRCD.L's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDAP.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 4.12% | 4.21% | 5.36% | 5.72% | 6.92% | 5.59% | 3.49% | 5.52% | 6.04% | 4.55% | 4.54% | 5.46% |
JRCD.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 1.62% | 203.95% | 1.97% | 1.67% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDAP.L and JRCD.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRCD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRCD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IDAP.L.
IDAP.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JRCD.L is China Equities. IDAP.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while JRCD.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IDAP.L and 0.40% for JRCD.L.
Find the right allocation for IDAP.L and JRCD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer