ICVT vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICVT (iShares Convertible Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index, while QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. ICVT is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. ICVT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

ICVT vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ICVT

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 7.16%
• YTD: 25.28%
• 6M: 24.31%
• 1Y: 42.20%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICVT vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	18.07%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

ICVT vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICVT	QCON
Technology	55.2%	-
Healthcare	44.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.9%
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

ICVT vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICVT

ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICVT vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ICVT	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.62	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ICVT	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	—	—

Drawdowns

ICVT vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICVT drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICVT and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICVT	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	0.00%	-33.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	0.00%	-9.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ICVT	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.36%	0.00%	+14.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	0.00%	+13.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	0.00%	+15.50%

ICVT vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICVT vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF	1.30%	1.73%	2.19%	1.85%	1.93%	7.70%	3.98%	1.86%	4.82%	2.56%	3.06%	1.57%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ICVT or QCON?

On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICVT or QCON?

ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICVT or QCON?

ICVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between ICVT and QCON?

ICVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ICVT and 0.32% for QCON.