ICVT vs. BSJP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP).
ICVT and BSJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICVT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2015. BSJP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. It was launched on Sep 27, 2017. Both ICVT and BSJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ICVT vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICVT vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 4.76% | 18.10% | 10.61% | 15.35% | -20.66% | -0.66% | 61.01% | 21.76% | -0.27% | 2.25% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 0.35% |
Returns By Period
ICVT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICVT vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICVT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICVT vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank
ICVT
BSJP
ICVT vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICVT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICVT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ICVT and BSJP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICVT vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison
ICVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than BSJP's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT iShares Convertible Bond ETF | 1.59% | 1.73% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 7.70% | 3.98% | 1.86% | 4.82% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 1.57% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 3.10% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICVT vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICVT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | — | — |
Volatility
ICVT vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICVT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | — | — |