PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than XSCS.L's 7.09% return.


ICSU.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.01%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*

XSCS.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
7.09%
6M
5.58%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.60%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%22.78%12.05%
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
7.09%-3.23%16.15%-5.00%11.79%19.16%5.49%22.78%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ICSU.L and XSCS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

1.00

The correlation between ICSU.L and XSCS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICSU.L
XSCS.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
99.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

ICSU.L
99.0%
XSCS.L
99.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ICSU.L
1.0%
XSCS.L
1.0%

Basic Materials

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Communication Services

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Energy

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Financial Services

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Healthcare

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Industrials

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Real Estate

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Technology

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Utilities

ICSU.L

-

XSCS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XSCS.L
XSCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICSU.LXSCS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

0.42

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

1.02

-0.20

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is comparable to the XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSU.L and XSCS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICSU.LXSCS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.27

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.71

-0.23

Drawdowns

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than XSCS.L's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and XSCS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICSU.LXSCS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-14.91%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.11%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-11.68%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-12.94%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-7.09%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-4.12%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.78%

+0.09%

Volatility

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) have volatilities of 6.57% and 6.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICSU.LXSCS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

6.46%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

11.77%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

14.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.45%

13.38%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

14.40%

-0.09%

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSCS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Dividend Comparison

ICSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
1.95%2.11%2.15%2.20%2.96%1.95%2.99%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ICSU.L and XSCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSCS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.

ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while XSCS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.12% for XSCS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and XSCS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer