ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L
ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XSCS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - ICSU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index while XSCS.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSU.L returned 7.91%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for XSCS.L. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ICSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSCS.L.
Performance
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICSU.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than XSCS.L's 7.09% return.
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XSCS.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | 12.05% |
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 7.09% | -3.23% | 16.15% | -5.00% | 11.79% | 19.16% | 5.49% | 22.78% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSU.L and XSCS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ICSU.L and XSCS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICSU.L
XSCS.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
ICSU.L
XSCS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ICSU.L
XSCS.L
Basic Materials
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Communication Services
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Energy
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Financial Services
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Healthcare
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Industrials
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Real Estate
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Technology
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Utilities
ICSU.L
-
XSCS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICSU.L
XSCS.L
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSU.L | XSCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.42 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 1.02 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSU.L | XSCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.27 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.60 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSU.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than XSCS.L's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSU.L and XSCS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSU.L | XSCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -14.91% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.11% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -11.68% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -12.94% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -7.09% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.12% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 3.78% | +0.09% |
Volatility
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) have volatilities of 6.57% and 6.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSU.L | XSCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 6.46% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 11.77% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 14.24% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 13.38% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 14.40% | -0.09% |
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSCS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSU.L vs. XSCS.L - Dividend Comparison
ICSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 1.95% | 2.11% | 2.15% | 2.20% | 2.96% | 1.95% | 2.99% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ICSU.L and XSCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSCS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSCS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.
ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while XSCS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ICSU.L and 0.12% for XSCS.L.
Find the right allocation for ICSU.L and XSCS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer