ICSH vs. VNLA
ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. ICSH is actively managed, while VNLA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICSH returned 3.69%/yr vs 3.83%/yr for VNLA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for VNLA.
Performance
ICSH vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ICSH having a 1.53% return and VNLA slightly higher at 1.59%.
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
VNLA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSH vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.53% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 1.59% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% | 3.01% | 4.43% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSH and VNLA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, ICSH and VNLA have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSH vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank
ICSH
VNLA
ICSH vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICSH | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.59 | 3.56 | +3.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.88 | 11.10 | +32.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 290.20 | 57.09 | +233.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICSH vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum VNLA drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and VNLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSH | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -4.49% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.43% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -0.49% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.73% | -1.76% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.23% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.08% | -0.07% |
Volatility
ICSH vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) is 0.13%, while Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that ICSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSH | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 0.15% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.29% | 0.46% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39% | 0.63% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 1.04% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 1.42% | -0.36% |
ICSH vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSH vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison
ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than VNLA's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.77% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSH and VNLA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNLA has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICSH dropped -3.94% vs VNLA's -4.49%.
On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.83% vs 3.69% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.83% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.
VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.34% for ICSH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for ICSH and 0.23% for VNLA.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 7.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICSH and VNLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer