ICSH vs. SPTU
ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - ICSH tracks the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD) while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICSH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
ICSH vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ICSH having a 1.45% return and SPTU slightly higher at 1.48%.
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.76%
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICSH vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.45% | 1.01% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICSH and SPTU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICSH vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
ICSH
SPTU
ICSH vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 44.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 297.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | 11.82 | -9.89 |
Drawdowns
ICSH vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -0.04% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.00% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
ICSH vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39% | 0.32% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 0.32% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 0.32% | +0.74% |
ICSH vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICSH vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICSH and SPTU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
ICSH tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD), while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for ICSH and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for ICSH and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer