PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICPI vs. STPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICPI vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 1.79% return.


ICPI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STPZ

1D
-0.00%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPI vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.70%0.32%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
1.79%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPI and STPZ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICPI vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPI

STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPI vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ICPI vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICPISTPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.20

0.90

+5.30

Drawdowns

ICPI vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum STPZ drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and STPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICPISTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-6.77%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-1.31%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

ICPI vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICPISTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95%

1.83%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.95%

3.29%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

2.98%

-2.03%

ICPI vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICPI vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than STPZ's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.80%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
4.10%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICPI and STPZ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for STPZ.

STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.

ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.20% for STPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICPI and STPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer