ICPI vs. IWM
ICPI (iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICPI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. ICPI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
ICPI vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.58% return.
ICPI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- YTD
- 20.58%
- 1Y
- 35.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
ICPI vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.76% | 0.32% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 20.58% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICPI and IWM is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICPI vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
ICPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWM
ICPI vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICPI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICPI vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICPI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -59.05% | +58.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -1.62% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -10.72% | +10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility
ICPI vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICPI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00% | 19.39% | -18.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 22.54% | -21.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 23.00% | -22.00% |
ICPI vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICPI vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.57% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICPI and IWM have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
ICPI has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.
ICPI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.19% for IWM.
Find the right allocation for ICPI and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer