PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICPAX vs. SRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICPAX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund (ICPAX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPAX achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 32.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ICPAX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 7.01%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.


ICPAX

1D
-1.15%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
24.39%
6M
23.68%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
23.97%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
7.01%

SRV

1D
-1.56%
1M
0.70%
YTD
32.23%
6M
34.87%
1Y
40.95%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
26.14%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPAX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICPAX
Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund
24.39%18.11%17.52%-1.37%29.10%32.79%-24.34%14.25%-30.97%-7.51%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
32.23%5.05%50.70%19.88%20.11%50.45%-41.65%33.99%-21.61%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPAX and SRV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.51

The correlation between ICPAX and SRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICPAX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPAX
ICPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ICPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ICPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SRV
SRV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPAX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund (ICPAX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICPAXSRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

3.13

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

8.90

+5.56

ICPAX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICPAX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICPAX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPAX drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPAX and SRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICPAXSRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.39%

-92.97%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-13.13%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.60%

-26.26%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-26.26%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.43%

-81.70%

+10.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-7.75%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-48.63%

+18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

4.61%

-2.07%

Volatility

ICPAX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund (ICPAX) is 5.50%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that ICPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICPAXSRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

7.70%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

15.88%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

19.42%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

26.46%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.73%

38.29%

-9.56%

ICPAX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPAX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICPAX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

ICPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SRV's 15.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICPAX
Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund
0.39%0.60%1.07%1.50%1.24%1.26%1.95%1.56%0.60%0.08%0.17%0.72%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
15.62%19.31%12.85%15.56%8.85%4.72%12.05%10.59%12.73%9.07%7.95%11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICPAX and SRV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRV has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to ICPAX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICPAX dropped -77.39% vs SRV's -92.97%.

ICPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICPAX and SRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer