ICOP vs. TURF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) and TURF (T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, while TURF is a Natural Resources fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past year, ICOP returned 82.41% vs 27.21% for TURF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICOP charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TURF.

Performance

ICOP vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than TURF's 8.99% return.

ICOP

• 1D: -5.31%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 82.41%
• 3Y*: 30.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TURF

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOP vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	13.96%	56.14%
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	8.99%	17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOP and TURF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.72

The correlation between ICOP and TURF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICOP vs. TURF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICOP	TURF
Basic Materials	100.0%	49.6%
Communication Services	-	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	15.0%
Energy	-	33.9%
Financial Services	-	2.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

ICOP vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 61
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

TURF

TURF Risk / Return Rank: 52
TURF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TURF Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TURF Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TURF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TURF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOP vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOP	TURF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.59	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.12	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	2.45	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	10.03	+1.12

ICOP vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the TURF Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOP and TURF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICOP vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and TURF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOP	TURF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.67%	-11.15%	-27.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-11.15%	-14.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.41%	-11.15%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-1.84%	-9.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.41%	2.72%	+4.69%

Volatility

ICOP vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) at 6.10%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TURF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOP	TURF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.27%	6.10%	+10.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.00%	14.07%	+20.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	17.22%	+22.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.44%	17.09%	+17.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.44%	17.09%	+17.35%

ICOP vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOP vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than TURF's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	1.78%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%
TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF	1.37%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOP and TURF in my portfolio?

ICOP and TURF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOP or TURF?

ICOP has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to TURF (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOP dropped -38.67% vs TURF's -11.15%.

Which ETF is better, ICOP or TURF?

On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 82.41% vs 27.21% for TURF. On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TURF has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ICOP or TURF?

Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 82.41% return vs 27.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOP or TURF?

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOP or TURF?

ICOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.37% for TURF.

What is the main difference between ICOP and TURF?

ICOP is categorized as Copper, while TURF is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ICOP and 0.44% for TURF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.