PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOI vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOI vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOI achieves a -22.45% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's 7.80% return.


ICOI

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.71%
6M
-13.91%
YTD
-22.45%
1Y
-43.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.55%

PBP

1D
0.22%
1M
1.70%
6M
6.52%
YTD
7.80%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
7.27%
ALL TIME*
5.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$610.26K$661.95K$611.06K
$1.16M$1.09M$978.18K

ICOI vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-22.45%-6.51%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
7.80%11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOI and PBP is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.48

The correlation between ICOI and PBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOI vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICOI vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICOIPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.51

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

3.45

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

17.72

-19.13

ICOI vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOI Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOI and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICOI vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than PBP's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOIPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-43.43%

-15.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.58%

-5.22%

-49.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.37%

0.00%

-55.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-6.64%

-24.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.57%

1.02%

+37.55%

Volatility

ICOI vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 2.15%. This indicates that ICOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOIPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

2.15%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.53%

6.10%

+29.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.80%

7.43%

+42.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.33%

11.85%

+37.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

13.66%

+35.67%

ICOI vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOI vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 202.94%, more than PBP's 11.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
202.94%247.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.39%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOI and PBP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOI has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to PBP (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOI dropped -59.32% vs PBP's -43.43%.

On 1-year performance, PBP leads with 19.22% vs -43.09% for ICOI. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBP has performed better with a 19.22% return vs -43.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICOI.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 202.94%, compared with 11.39% for PBP.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.29% for PBP.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOI and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer