ICOI vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ICOI (Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICOI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

ICOI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ICOI

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: -28.76%
• YTD: -23.05%
• 1Y: -52.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-9.52%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOI and ACYS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

ICOI vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOI

ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 1
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOI	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	—	—

Drawdowns

ICOI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOI drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOI and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOI	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.32%	-0.63%	-58.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.71%	-0.24%	-55.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-0.14%	-29.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ICOI	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.71%	3.45%	+46.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.99%	3.45%	+46.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.99%	3.45%	+46.54%

ICOI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

ICOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 294.36%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
ICOI Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	294.36%	247.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOI and ACYS in my portfolio?

ICOI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICOI or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICOI or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ICOI or ACYS?

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 294.36%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between ICOI and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ICOI and 0.75% for ACYS.