PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICMBX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMBX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than NWQIX's 5.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICMBX having a 5.83% annualized return and NWQIX not far behind at 5.69%.


ICMBX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.49%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.52%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
5.83%

NWQIX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.61%
YTD
5.71%
6M
6.17%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
10.64%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
4.18%13.45%15.40%14.18%-12.44%12.85%9.18%6.45%-13.37%8.09%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.71%11.74%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMBX and NWQIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.60

The correlation between ICMBX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICMBX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMBX
ICMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ICMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICMBXNWQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.84

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

5.06

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

23.89

-15.55

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMBX and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMBX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMBX and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICMBXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-23.89%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-2.94%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.49%

-4.59%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-17.75%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-23.89%

-9.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-3.00%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.62%

+1.12%

Volatility

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.25%. This indicates that ICMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICMBXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

1.25%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

3.13%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

3.97%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

5.70%

+5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

6.33%

+4.99%

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICMBX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

ICMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than NWQIX's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
1.75%2.15%2.96%4.14%1.82%2.10%1.68%5.47%3.48%2.96%3.64%2.19%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.49%6.09%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICMBX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICMBX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to NWQIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMBX dropped -33.71% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICMBX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer