ICMBX vs. CONWX
ICMBX (Intrepid Capital Fund) and CONWX (Concorde Wealth Management Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, ICMBX returned 5.83%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for CONWX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICMBX charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for CONWX.
Performance
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICMBX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMBX has underperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
ICMBX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
CONWX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 13.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICMBX Intrepid Capital Fund | 4.18% | 13.45% | 15.40% | 14.18% | -12.44% | 12.85% | 9.18% | 6.45% | -13.37% | 8.09% |
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 5.52% | 11.95% | 13.58% | 0.20% | -2.51% | 19.73% | 8.76% | 16.84% | -1.95% | 7.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICMBX and CONWX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ICMBX and CONWX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICMBX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank
ICMBX
CONWX
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICMBX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 3.12 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 9.37 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICMBX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than CONWX's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMBX and CONWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICMBX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -26.09% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -4.44% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.49% | -9.86% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.76% | -12.49% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.71% | -26.09% | -7.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -4.44% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -2.78% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.47% | +0.27% |
Volatility
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison
Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 1.97%. This indicates that ICMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICMBX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 1.97% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.53% | 5.23% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 7.11% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 10.20% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 11.10% | +0.22% |
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICMBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICMBX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison
ICMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than CONWX's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 3.49% | 3.69% | 10.55% | 2.16% | 7.85% | 3.63% | 3.86% | 2.16% | 5.09% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICMBX Intrepid Capital Fund | 1.75% | 2.15% | 2.96% | 4.14% | 1.82% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 5.47% | 3.48% | 2.96% | 3.64% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICMBX and CONWX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICMBX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to CONWX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMBX dropped -33.71% vs CONWX's -26.09%.
CONWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICMBX and CONWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer