PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICMBX vs. IOEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMBX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than IOEZX's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMBX has underperformed IOEZX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while IOEZX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.


ICMBX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.49%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.52%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
5.83%

IOEZX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
13.04%
6M
12.32%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
4.18%13.45%15.40%14.18%-12.44%12.85%9.18%6.45%-13.37%8.09%
IOEZX
ICON Equity Income Fund
13.04%14.29%6.12%3.82%-13.56%24.15%3.16%27.70%-10.11%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMBX and IOEZX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2005

0.82

The correlation between ICMBX and IOEZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICMBX vs. IOEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMBX
ICMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ICMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IOEZX
IOEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IOEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IOEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICMBXIOEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

4.10

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

15.09

-6.75

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IOEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMBX and IOEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMBX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum IOEZX drawdown of -56.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMBX and IOEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICMBXIOEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-56.15%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-6.77%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.49%

-13.95%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-21.47%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-38.12%

+4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.88%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-8.57%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.84%

-0.10%

Volatility

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) is 2.40%, while ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that ICMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICMBXIOEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.71%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

8.96%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

12.19%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

13.80%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

16.49%

-5.17%

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IOEZX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICMBX vs. IOEZX - Dividend Comparison

ICMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than IOEZX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
1.75%2.15%2.96%4.14%1.82%2.10%1.68%5.47%3.48%2.96%3.64%2.19%
IOEZX
ICON Equity Income Fund
2.99%3.56%4.32%3.75%13.63%12.92%3.68%4.74%3.80%3.13%3.32%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICMBX and IOEZX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOEZX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to ICMBX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMBX dropped -33.71% vs IOEZX's -56.15%.

IOEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICMBX and IOEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer