ICMBX vs. FSIRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ICMBX (Intrepid Capital Fund) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, ICMBX returned 5.83%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for FSIRX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICMBX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.

Performance

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMBX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ICMBX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.46% annualized return.

ICMBX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 3.52%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 5.83%

FSIRX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 8.81%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 5.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICMBX Intrepid Capital Fund	4.18%	13.45%	15.40%	14.18%	-12.44%	12.85%	9.18%	6.45%	-13.37%	8.09%
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	6.58%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	10.55%	-3.99%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMBX and FSIRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.53

The correlation between ICMBX and FSIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ICMBX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICMBX

ICMBX Risk / Return Rank: 37
ICMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ICMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ICMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ICMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ICMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICMBX	FSIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.54	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.50	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.48	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	4.62	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	19.04	-10.70

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMBX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMBX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMBX and FSIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICMBX	FSIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-33.39%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.89%	-2.70%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.49%	-5.81%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.76%	-12.82%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-19.98%	-13.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-2.70%	+1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-4.16%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	0.65%	+1.09%

Volatility

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.36%. This indicates that ICMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICMBX	FSIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	1.36%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	3.88%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	4.91%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.88%	6.92%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.32%	6.75%	+4.57%

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICMBX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

ICMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than FSIRX's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	4.27%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
ICMBX Intrepid Capital Fund	1.75%	2.15%	2.96%	4.14%	1.82%	2.10%	1.68%	5.47%	3.48%	2.96%	3.64%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICMBX and FSIRX in my portfolio?

ICMBX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICMBX or FSIRX?

ICMBX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to FSIRX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMBX dropped -33.71% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.