PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICMBX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICMBX achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 7.61% return.


ICMBX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.41%
6M
4.90%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
5.81%
ALL TIME*
6.38%

FRGAX

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.67%
6M
5.42%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
6.17%13.45%15.40%14.18%-2.17%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
7.61%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ICMBX and FRGAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.79

The correlation between ICMBX and FRGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICMBX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICMBX
ICMBX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ICMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICMBXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.21

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

9.26

-2.09

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICMBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICMBX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICMBX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICMBX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICMBXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-11.77%

-21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-7.03%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.49%

-11.77%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.61%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-1.57%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Intrepid Capital Fund (ICMBX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICMBXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.74%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

8.17%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

9.88%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

10.38%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

10.38%

+0.91%

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICMBX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICMBX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

ICMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FRGAX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.86%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICMBX
Intrepid Capital Fund
1.63%2.15%2.96%4.14%1.82%2.10%1.68%5.47%3.48%2.96%3.64%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICMBX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to ICMBX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICMBX dropped -33.71% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICMBX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer