ICLU.L vs. IB01.L
ICLU.L (Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLU.L is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. ICLU.L is actively managed, while IB01.L is passively managed. Over the past year, ICLU.L returned 5.34% vs 3.98% for IB01.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.
Performance
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLU.L achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.41% return.
ICLU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IB01.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 2.17% | 4.23% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.41% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLU.L and IB01.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
ICLU.L
IB01.L
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICLU.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -30.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.27 | 8.02 | -5.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.47 | 115.49 | -107.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.67 | 570.06 | -530.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICLU.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22 | 11.94 | -7.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.37 | 3.78 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLU.L drawdown since its inception was -0.91%, roughly equal to the maximum IB01.L drawdown of -0.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLU.L and IB01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLU.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -0.91% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.63% | -0.03% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.08% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 0.01% | +0.12% |
Volatility
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that ICLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLU.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.10% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.82% | 0.24% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 0.33% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 0.37% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 0.72% | +0.74% |
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICLU.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ICLU.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLU.L and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ICLU.L.
ICLU.L is categorized as CLO, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ICLU.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.
Find the right allocation for ICLU.L and IB01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer