PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICLN vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICLN vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 84.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 9.32%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return.


ICLN

1D
-3.25%
1M
-10.73%
6M
6.35%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
40.77%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
-2.55%
10Y*
9.32%

SOXX

1D
-4.77%
1M
-7.11%
6M
67.77%
YTD
84.03%
1Y
125.94%
3Y*
48.43%
5Y*
31.11%
10Y*
34.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICLN vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
13.66%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
84.03%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ICLN and SOXX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008

0.58

The correlation between ICLN and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICLN vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICLN
SOXX

Utilities

36.7%

-

Energy

30.2%

-

Industrials

27.6%

-

Technology

3.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

ICLN
36.7%
SOXX

-

Energy

ICLN
30.2%
SOXX

-

Industrials

ICLN
27.6%
SOXX

-

Technology

ICLN
3.1%
SOXX
100.0%

Basic Materials

ICLN
1.4%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

ICLN
0.2%
SOXX

-

Financial Services

ICLN
0.1%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

ICLN

-

SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

ICLN

-

SOXX

-

Healthcare

ICLN

-

SOXX

-

Real Estate

ICLN

-

SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICLN vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICLN vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICLNSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

8.03

-6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

25.14

-18.40

ICLN vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICLN and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICLN vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than SOXX's maximum drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICLNSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.15%

-70.21%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-15.77%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.18%

-41.36%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.16%

-45.75%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.75%

-45.75%

-21.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.15%

-15.48%

-33.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-19.92%

-46.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

5.03%

+1.04%

Volatility

ICLN vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 11.84%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICLNSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.84%

22.50%

-10.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

36.44%

-12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.50%

42.11%

-12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.90%

37.77%

-9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

34.27%

-6.87%

ICLN vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICLN vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
0.99%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICLN and SOXX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (22.50%) compared to ICLN (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.00% vs 9.32% for ICLN. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICLN has been the lower-risk option at 11.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.00% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.

ICLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.

ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICLN and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer