ICLN vs. SBIT
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ICLN returned 40.77% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
ICLN vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -10.73%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 40.77%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 58.27%
- YTD
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 124.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICLN vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 13.66% | 47.05% | -17.21% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 44.00% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and SBIT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
SBIT
ICLN vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.60 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 5.92 | +0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, roughly equal to the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -91.35% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -47.94% | +26.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.15% | -77.15% | +28.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.47% | -68.83% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 21.04% | -14.97% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is 11.84%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that ICLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 22.98% | -11.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 68.89% | -44.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 88.51% | -59.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 96.89% | -68.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 96.89% | -69.49% |
ICLN vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 0.99% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.97% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and SBIT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to ICLN (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 40.77% for ICLN. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ICLN has been the lower-risk option at 11.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 40.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.99% for ICLN.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer