ICLN vs. LYM9.DE
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 8.88%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for LYM9.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.
Performance
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while LYM9.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYM9.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 8.88%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.76%
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 1Y
- 51.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.49%
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 10.70% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 23.32% | 46.35% | -13.24% | -18.68% | -17.91% | -6.84% | 60.36% | 46.87% | -13.44% | 32.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and LYM9.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ICLN and LYM9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
LYM9.DE
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 4.01 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 13.38 | -8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than LYM9.DE's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and LYM9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -75.58% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -12.75% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -39.69% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -57.00% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -57.86% | -8.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -12.32% | -38.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -48.89% | -17.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 3.83% | +2.95% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) at 8.88%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 8.88% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 19.77% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 23.53% | +6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 24.78% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 23.39% | +4.04% |
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than LYM9.DE's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and LYM9.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while LYM9.DE is Energy Equities. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and LYM9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer