ICLN vs. EXV6.DE
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and EXV6.DE (iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE)) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while EXV6.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Basic Resources. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICLN returned 8.88%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for EXV6.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EXV6.DE.
Performance
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while EXV6.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EXV6.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICLN having a 10.70% return and EXV6.DE slightly lower at 10.43%. Over the past 10 years, ICLN has underperformed EXV6.DE with an annualized return of 8.88%, while EXV6.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.42%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.76%
EXV6.DE
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 52.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.18%
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 10.70% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
EXV6.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) | 10.43% | 50.35% | -13.94% | 0.77% | 3.33% | 16.74% | 23.85% | 19.74% | -17.65% | 39.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and EXV6.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.47 |
The correlation between ICLN and EXV6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (10 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
EXV6.DE
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | EXV6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.65 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 7.73 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than EXV6.DE's maximum drawdown of -80.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and EXV6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | EXV6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -80.71% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -19.90% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -32.81% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -36.59% | -20.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | -50.23% | -16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -17.84% | -32.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -41.61% | -24.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 6.84% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV6.DE) at 9.36%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXV6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | EXV6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 9.36% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 25.42% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 29.20% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 29.04% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 28.97% | -1.54% |
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EXV6.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. EXV6.DE - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EXV6.DE's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXV6.DE iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) | 1.81% | 1.95% | 3.23% | 3.57% | 6.02% | 5.15% | 2.86% | 5.56% | 2.93% | 2.14% | 1.80% | 5.20% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and EXV6.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXV6.DE.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while EXV6.DE is Industrials Equities. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while EXV6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Basic Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.46% for EXV6.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and EXV6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer