ICLN vs. BITI
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICLN returned 1.53%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
ICLN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLN achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.
ICLN
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -10.73%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 40.77%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
BITI
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 68.34%
- 3Y*
- -30.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICLN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 13.66% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | 6.79% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 28.75% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and BITI is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.28 |
The correlation between ICLN and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
BITI
ICLN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.72 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 6.78 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -92.16% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -25.28% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | -84.63% | +41.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.15% | -85.94% | +36.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.47% | -68.34% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 10.11% | -4.04% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 11.84% and 11.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 11.38% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 34.25% | -9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 44.14% | -14.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 52.28% | -24.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 52.28% | -24.88% |
ICLN vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.10% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 0.99% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and BITI have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICLN has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICLN dropped -87.15% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, ICLN leads with 1.53% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ICLN has performed better with a 1.53% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.99% for ICLN.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer