ICLN vs. 2B76.DE
ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) and 2B76.DE (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while 2B76.DE is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICLN returned -0.21%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for 2B76.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICLN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 2B76.DE.
Performance
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ICLN is traded in USD, while 2B76.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 2B76.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICLN having a 27.33% return and 2B76.DE slightly lower at 27.18%.
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.01%
- 1Y
- 60.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
2B76.DE
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 27.18%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 44.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- —
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 27.33% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 27.18% | 17.98% | 5.71% | 39.27% | -34.83% | 21.80% | 38.47% | 38.93% | -19.49% | 47.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLN and 2B76.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICLN
2B76.DE
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICLN | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 2.75 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | 9.45 | +4.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLN drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than 2B76.DE's maximum drawdown of -44.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLN and 2B76.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLN | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -44.48% | -42.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -15.34% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.18% | -25.93% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.16% | -44.48% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.03% | -1.32% | -41.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.56% | -11.46% | -55.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 4.48% | -0.07% |
Volatility
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) at 9.33%. This indicates that ICLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B76.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICLN | 2B76.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 9.33% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 19.02% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 23.22% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 23.49% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 23.32% | +4.00% |
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B76.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICLN vs. 2B76.DE - Dividend Comparison
ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while 2B76.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICLN and 2B76.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
ICLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while 2B76.DE is Robotics. ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index, while 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ICLN and 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICLN and 2B76.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer