ICLAX vs. TIBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX).
ICLAX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Feb 28, 2002. TIBIX is an actively managed fund by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002.
Performance
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio | -1.12% | 12.18% | 7.30% | 10.23% | -15.19% | 5.43% | 13.16% | 12.33% | -4.36% | 11.12% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 10.67% | 37.01% | 13.48% | 18.28% | -7.69% | 20.36% | -0.40% | 18.01% | -4.31% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICLAX achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ICLAX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 5.13%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.
ICLAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.13%
TIBIX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 39.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICLAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICLAX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
ICLAX
TIBIX
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICLAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 3.64 | -2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 4.62 | -2.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.80 | -0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 4.60 | -2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 22.49 | -15.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICLAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 3.64 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.42 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICLAX and TIBIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison
ICLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than TIBIX's 5.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio | 3.19% | 3.27% | 2.80% | 2.50% | 1.79% | 7.84% | 4.16% | 4.06% | 7.97% | 7.69% | 4.61% | 5.90% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.36% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
Drawdowns
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICLAX drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICLAX and TIBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICLAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -48.88% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -7.45% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -20.79% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.78% | -34.85% | +14.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -2.72% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -6.00% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 1.75% | -0.37% |
Volatility
ICLAX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio (ICLAX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICLAX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.15% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 6.59% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.33% | 10.84% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 11.11% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.17% | 13.48% | -6.31% |