PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICISX vs. GTTTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ICISX having a 21.27% return and GTTTX slightly higher at 21.95%. Over the past 10 years, ICISX has underperformed GTTTX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while GTTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


ICISX

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.40%
YTD
21.27%
6M
18.98%
1Y
37.09%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
11.25%

GTTTX

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.95%
6M
19.36%
1Y
44.12%
3Y*
32.42%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
21.27%8.38%11.15%14.13%-13.57%34.53%9.95%20.26%-17.54%11.24%
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
21.95%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ICISX and GTTTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.96

The correlation between ICISX and GTTTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICISX vs. GTTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICISX
ICISX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICISX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ICISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICISXGTTTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

5.06

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.91

17.80

-1.89

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the GTTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICISX and GTTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICISX drawdown since its inception was -59.91%, which is greater than GTTTX's maximum drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICISX and GTTTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICISXGTTTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.91%

-56.58%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-9.16%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.05%

-39.29%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-39.29%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.01%

-47.29%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.36%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-9.91%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.59%

+0.09%

Volatility

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio (ICISX) is 4.79%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that ICISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICISXGTTTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

5.40%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

12.69%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

18.66%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

35.35%

-13.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

30.81%

-7.15%

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICISX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICISX vs. GTTTX - Dividend Comparison

ICISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.05%, more than GTTTX's 6.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
6.88%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%
ICISX
VY Columbia Small Cap Value II Portfolio
23.05%27.95%11.14%7.68%17.24%0.74%4.30%13.90%14.67%4.45%4.26%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICISX and GTTTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to ICISX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICISX dropped -59.91% vs GTTTX's -56.58%.

ICISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICISX and GTTTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer