ICCIX vs. TBGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX).
ICCIX is managed by Innealta Capital. It was launched on Dec 30, 2011. TBGVX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Jun 14, 1993.
Performance
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund | 2.60% | 26.98% | 2.33% | 10.95% | -13.47% | 1.05% | 27.19% | 6.62% | -14.22% | 23.57% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 3.44% | 23.86% | 2.47% | 12.48% | -7.52% | 15.62% | -1.00% | 14.64% | -6.72% | 15.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICCIX achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ICCIX has underperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 7.00%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.70% annualized return.
ICCIX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
TBGVX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICCIX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICCIX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank
ICCIX
TBGVX
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICCIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 2.13 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.74 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 6.58 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICCIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.73 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICCIX and TBGVX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison
ICCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than TBGVX's 11.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICCIX Dynamic International Opportunity Fund | 3.98% | 4.09% | 7.11% | 2.35% | 1.28% | 0.88% | 0.80% | 1.71% | 1.97% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.01% |
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 11.71% | 12.11% | 9.95% | 4.55% | 5.68% | 8.89% | 0.94% | 1.88% | 6.74% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICCIX drawdown since its inception was -28.83%, smaller than the maximum TBGVX drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICCIX and TBGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICCIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -50.97% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -9.56% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -17.71% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.83% | -31.18% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.98% | -7.46% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -6.09% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.66% | +0.42% |
Volatility
ICCIX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic International Opportunity Fund (ICCIX) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that ICCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICCIX | TBGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 4.70% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 7.39% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 12.36% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 11.03% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 12.64% | +1.26% |