ICAP vs. SMMU
ICAP (InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF) and SMMU (PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICAP is a fund fund actively managed by InfraCap, while SMMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICAP returned 18.21%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for SMMU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICAP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMMU.
Performance
ICAP vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICAP achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than SMMU's 1.10% return.
ICAP
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 25.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
ICAP vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAP InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF | 7.55% | 15.77% | 14.83% | 8.82% | -10.10% | 0.57% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.10% | 4.06% | 2.68% | 4.39% | -2.45% | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICAP and SMMU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2021 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICAP vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank
ICAP
SMMU
ICAP vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICAP | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.90 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 5.10 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 18.24 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICAP | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 3.84 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ICAP vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, which is greater than SMMU's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and SMMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICAP | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.20% | -5.09% | -19.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -0.77% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.31% | -1.95% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.03% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -0.55% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 0.22% | +2.55% |
Volatility
ICAP vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) at 0.31%. This indicates that ICAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICAP | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 0.31% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 0.79% | +9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 1.02% | +12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 1.67% | +16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 2.73% | +15.44% |
ICAP vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICAP vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison
ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than SMMU's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAP InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF | 9.50% | 8.89% | 8.30% | 8.65% | 8.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.84% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICAP and SMMU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICAP has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to SMMU (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAP dropped -24.20% vs SMMU's -5.09%.
On 3-year performance, ICAP leads with 18.21% vs 3.67% for SMMU. On fees, SMMU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ICAP has performed better with a 18.21% return vs 3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICAP.
ICAP has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 2.84% for SMMU.
They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICAP and 0.35% for SMMU.
SMMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICAP and SMMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer