PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICAP vs. FPAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICAP vs. FPAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAP achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than FPAS's -0.75% return.


ICAP

1D
-1.34%
1M
1.75%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.96%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
10Y*

FPAS

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICAP vs. FPAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
7.55%15.77%0.71%
FPAS
FPA Short Duration Government ETF
-0.75%7.15%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAP and FPAS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICAP vs. FPAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICAP
ICAP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ICAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ICAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICAP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FPAS
FPAS Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FPAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPAS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FPAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPAS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICAP vs. FPAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) and FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICAPFPASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

0.93

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

1.39

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.23

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.27

3.71

+5.56

ICAP vs. FPAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the FPAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAP and FPAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICAPFPASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

0.93

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.98

-0.53

Drawdowns

ICAP vs. FPAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAP drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, which is greater than FPAS's maximum drawdown of -2.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAP and FPAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICAPFPASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.20%

-2.47%

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-2.47%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.85%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-0.67%

-7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

0.82%

+1.95%

Volatility

ICAP vs. FPAS - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) at 1.10%. This indicates that ICAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICAPFPASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

1.10%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

2.24%

+7.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

3.25%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

4.09%

+14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

4.09%

+14.08%

ICAP vs. FPAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FPAS's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICAP vs. FPAS - Dividend Comparison

ICAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than FPAS's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FPAS
FPA Short Duration Government ETF
4.78%4.75%0.68%0.00%0.00%
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
9.50%8.89%8.30%8.65%8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICAP and FPAS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICAP has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FPAS (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAP dropped -24.20% vs FPAS's -2.47%.

On 1-year performance, ICAP leads with 25.61% vs 3.02% for FPAS. On fees, FPAS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FPAS has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ICAP has performed better with a 25.61% return vs 3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPAS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ICAP.

ICAP has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 4.78% for FPAS.

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and FPA. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ICAP and 0.09% for FPAS.

ICAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICAP and FPAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer